Legal Opinion

Kreider v. Sterling National Bank

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 17, 1921No. Gen. No. 6,849PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from the City Court of Sterling; the Hon. C. E. Sheldon, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1920.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Heard

Appellant filed a bill in chancery against appellee. A demurrer was sustained to the bill, whereupon appellant took leave to file and did file an amended bill, to which a demurrer was filed and upon hearing thereon was sustained. Appellant stood by the amended bill. Thereupon the court entered judgment that the appellee “go hence without day” and that appellee have and recover from appellant its costs, which was not the proper form for a decree in chancery, from which judgment appellant has appealed.

The amended bill alleged, in substance, among other things, that while appellant was the owner…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bearss v. FordIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Totten v. TottenIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Kelly v. LehmannIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Darst v. MurphyIllinois Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kreider v. Sterling National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API