Legal Opinion

Insurance Co. of North America v. Cooley

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 5, 1968No. 43504PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pannell, Judge.

“Legally speaking, Mrs. [Cooley] could only demand support from her husband, but this does not prevent dependency upon her son, as a fact.” Glens Falls Indem. Co. v. Jordan, 56 Ga. App. 449, 457 (193 SE 96). And partial dependency of the mother may be established though the son’s contributions to her be at irregular intervals and of irregular amounts. Glens Falls Indem. Co. v. Jordan, supra, at p. 456. “Dependency does not depend on whether the alleged dependents could support themselves without decedent’s earnings, or so reduce their expenses that they would be supported…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Fuller v. InmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
  2. Savannah Electric Co. v. BellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  3. Smith v. HatcherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  4. Maryland Casualty Co. v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  5. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. HensonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dunnavant v. Newman Tire Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 2008
  2. City of Atlanta v. MorganSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
  3. Insurance Co. of North America v. RossCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  4. City of Atlanta v. McKinneySupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
  5. City of Atlanta v. McKinneySupreme Court of Georgia · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API