Legal Opinion

Pui Fong Tam v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 19, 1999PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In a negligence action to recover dam*614ages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bruno, J.), dated October 31, 1997, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that, under the particular circumstances presented, “there is a question of fact concerning whether or not the [defendant] City [of New York] had an adequate opportunity to remedy the [snow and ice] condition that allegedly caused the plaintiffs accident”. The court was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Candelier v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. Martinez v. Columbia Presbyterian Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. Krause v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. Canario v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Martinez v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. Shivers v. Price Bottom Stores, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. Maldonado v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API