Legal Opinion

Canario v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 26, 1998PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Sangiorgio, J.), dated November 18, 1996, which granted the motion of the defendant City of New York, inter alia, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against it and the cross motion of the défendants Nicholas Foccillo and Kim Foccillo for summary judgment dismiss*619ing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs to the respondents…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Simmons v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Newsome v. CservakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  3. Shelton v. SheltonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. Grillo v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  5. Murray v. PalmerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pui Fong Tam v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. Jackson v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025
  3. Tam v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API