Haines v. Seabrook Farms Co.

Pee Curiam.

Judgment was entered against the plaintiffs in the Supreme Court January 27th, 1922, and defendant served notice of appeal within one year hut did not file the notice until January 29th, 1923, one year and two days thereafter. Motion was made in the Supreme Court for an order directing its clerk to file the notice nunc pro tunc as of January 27th, 1923. This the Supreme Court refused to do, and made an order denying the motion. From this order the plaintiffs have appealed; and they have also made an independent motion here for .this court itself to order the Supreme Court clerk to…