Legal Opinion
Fishman v. Fisch Hat Co.
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas
Decided May 20, 1938PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Hartshorne, C. P. J.
Can a belated appeal be perfected nunc pro tunc by the appellate court in workmen’s compensation cases?
That it cannot in the ordinary case was a question which the Court of Errors and Appeals expressly refused to pass on in Haines v. Seabrook Farms Co., 99 N. J. L. 273; 122 Atl. Rep. 748. Numerous New Jersey cases exist, however, holding that an appeal will be dismissed where not taken within the time required by the statute. Mackay v. Mackay, 83 N. J. Eq. 650; 91 Atl. Rep. 316; Rogers v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co., 81 N. J. L. 40; 78 Atl. Rep. 664; State Council, Jr. O. U.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Haines v. Seabrook Farms Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1923
- State Council of the Junior Order United American Mechanics v. National Council of the Junior Order United American MechanicsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1908
- Williams v. WhiteSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1922
- Mackay v. MackaySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1914
- Prantl v. JunkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1917
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Scrudato v. MASCOT S. & L. ASSN.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- Borough of Park Ridge v. SalimoneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955