Legal Opinion
Baird v. Bell Helicopter Textron
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided May 29, 1980No. Civ. A. CA-4-77-310-KPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BELEW, District Judge.
Defendant Bell Helicopter Textron (“Bell”) has presented this Court with its various Motions for Determination of Applicable Law, and for Determination of Foreign Law and Third-Party Defendants Lac St. Jean Aviation, Ltd. and Canadian Helicopters, Ltd. have presented their Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Okanagan Helicopters, Ltd. has argued Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim upon which Relief may be Granted. After carefully considering the briefs of counsel, and having heard oral argument, this Court is of the opinion that…
2Cases cited63 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Torrington Co. v. StutzmanTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- Vasquez v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- Robert F. Mitchell, Individually v. Lone Star Ammunition, Inc., Etc., Day & Zimmerman, Inc., Etc. And Norris Industries, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Crisman v. Cooper Industries, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988
- Denman Ex Rel. Denman v. Snapper DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.