Denman Ex Rel. Denman v. Snapper Division
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BENAVIDES, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff Hunter W.P. Denman (“Hunter”) appeals the district court’s summary judgment that North Carolina’s products liability statute of repose bars his claims. We AFFIRM.
I
On April 21, 1987, Hunter, a minor, severed his left foot while' mowing a lawn with his grandfather’s Snapper riding lawnmower. Although his foot was surgically replaced, he has not regained its full use. Hunter alleges that the mower was defective because it was not equipped with a deadman’s switch or another safety device that might have prevented his injury and because it was accompanied by…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Mitchell v. CraftMississippi Supreme Court · 1968
- In re Shell Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- McDaniel v. RitterMississippi Supreme Court · 1989
- Gilda F. Williams v. Ac Spark Plugs Division of General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Huss v. GaydenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- Universal Truck & Equipment Co. v. Southworth-Milton, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
- Schexnayder v. Entergy Louisiana, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- ARTHUR W. TIFFORD, PA v. Tandem Energy Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- Houston Casualty Co. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's LondonDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1999
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.