Legal Opinion
Todd Creek Village Metropolitan District v. Valley Bank & Trust Co.
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided November 21, 2013No. Court of Appeals No. 12CA1302PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
JUDGE ROTHENBERG *
T1 At issue in this appeal is whether the plaintiff, Todd Creek Village Metropolitan District (the special district), had the constitutional and statutory authority to enter into loans and security agreements with the defendant, Valley Bank & Trust Company (the bank), and to pledge the district's assets as collateral. Because we conclude the special district had such authority, we reverse the judgment invalidating the loan and security agreement executed by the special district.
*593I. Background
T2 The parties stipulated to the salient facts. The special district is…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Colorado Water Conservation Board v. Upper Gunnison River Water Conservancy DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
- Gude v. City of LakewoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- Quintano v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1972
- McNichols v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
- Colorado-Ute Electric Ass'n v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Indian Mountain Corp. v. Indian Mountain Metropolitan DistrictColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
- Bill Barrett Corp. v. LembkeColorado Court of Appeals · 2018