Legal Opinion

Merilyn W. Butcher v. Cessna Aircraft Company, Martha J. Noble v. Cessna Aircraft Company, Carolyn S. Durbin v. Cessna Aircraft Company

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided August 29, 1988No. 87-4823PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Circuit Judge.

The widows of the victims of a small plane crash appeal from two district courts’ summary judgment dismissal of their products liability suit against Cessna Aircraft Co., the manufacturer of the airplane. The district courts in this consolidated suit held that the widows were precluded from suing Cessna because they made inconsistent statements in an earlier state suit and were thus barred by the doctrines of election of remedies and judicial estoppel. Because we hold that there was a genuine issue of fact on a key element of election of remedies or judicial estoppel…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Thomas v. BaileyMississippi Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Banes v. ThompsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Daughtrey v. DaughtreyMississippi Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Anaconda Aluminum Co. v. SharpMississippi Supreme Court · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Whitacre Partnership v. Biosignia, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  2. Gens v. Resolution Trust Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
  3. Gens v. ResolutionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API