Legal Opinion
Pliszka v. Axos Bank
District Court, S.D. California
Decided September 13, 2024No. 3:24-cv-00445Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSEPH PLISZKA, individually and on Case No.: 24-cv-445-RSH-SBC behalf of all others similarly situated, 12 Plaintiffs, 13 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S 14 MOTION TO COMPEL AXOS BANK, d/b/a UFB DIRECT, 15 ARBITRATION OR DISMISS Defendant. 16 [ECF No. 10] 17 18 19 Before the Court is a motion to compel arbitration or to dismiss, filed by defendant 20 Axos Bank d/b/a UFB Direct (“UFB”). ECF No. 10. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 21 7.1(d)(1), the Court finds the motion presented…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Chiron Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Ortho Diagnostic Systems, Inc., a New Jersey CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Badie v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.