Legal Opinion

Assicurazioni Generali, S.P.A. v. Milsap

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 20, 1988No. 9629PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLEIL, Justice.

Assicurazioni Generali appeals from a default judgment, contending that the trial court abused its discretion by ordering sanctions for violation of discovery rules and by excluding evidence, and that the awards of actual and exemplary damages are not supported by sufficient evidence. We affirm.

Generali insured four horses owned by Milsap for $110,000.00. In 1984, and while the policy was in effect, the horses were destroyed by fire. After Generali denied payment, Milsap filed suit, alleging bad faith by Generali. When Generali failed to timely answer discovery requests, Milsap…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  3. National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Morrow v. H.E.B., Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Bodnow Corp. v. City of HondoTexas Supreme Court · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Gober v. Terra + CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  2. Paradigm Oil, Inc. v. Retamco Operating, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Kubbernus v. ECAL Partners, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2018
  4. Minnick v. State Bar of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
  5. F.N. Fausing Trading ApS v. Estate of Barbouti, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API