Legal Opinion

Bolden v. Callahan

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided March 31, 2022No. 4:19-cv-00802Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION CHERYL BOLDEN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated PLAINTIFF v. Case No. 4:19-cv-00802-KGB SHARON CALLAHAN DEFENDANT FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Plaintiff Cheryl Bolden brought this action against defendant Sharon Callahan (Dkt. No. 1). Ms. Bolden alleged that Ms. Callahan failed to pay her and other similarly situated commission-based cosmetologists1 lawful minimum wages and overtime wages in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 216(b), et seq., and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. DardenSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Tony and Susan Alamo Foundation v. Secretary of LaborSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Goldberg v. Whitaker House Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. McLeod v. ThrelkeldSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API