Legal Opinion

Wells v. Betts

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 1899PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff, uolin I. Wells, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the defendant, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of St. Lawrence on the 24th day of May, 1898, upon the dismissal of the complaint by direction of the court at the St. Lawrence Trial Term.

Read the full summary

Appeal by the plaintiff, uolin I. Wells, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the defendant, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of St. Lawrence on the 24th day of May, 1898, upon the dismissal of the complaint by direction of the court at the St. Lawrence Trial Term. The defendant made a motion to dismiss the complaint upon the pleadings on the grounds: (1) That the plaintiff had not capacity to sue under section 2653a. of the Code of Civil Procedure. (2) That there are improperly united in the complaint two causes of action; one apparently under section 2653a of the…

1Opinion of the Court

Landon, J.:

The plaintiff has a capacity to sue, since he rests under no legal disability. The question intended to be raised by the allegation of his incapacity is .whether he is embraced within either class of persons to whom section 2653a of the Code of Civil Procedure gives the particular remedy therein provided. This question we proceed to consider, since if the remedy is not given to him, the complaint was properly dismissed.

The section, as first enacted in 1892, provided that “Any person interested in a will or codicil admitted to probate in this State, as provided by the Code of Civil…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hatfield v. . SnedenNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Lewis v. . CookNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. Ocobock v. EelesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pringle v. BurroughsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  2. In re the Will of RuppanerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1895
  3. In re the Probate of a Paper Purporting to be the Last Will & Testament of BrandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API