Legal Opinion

In re the Will of Ruppaner

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided December 15, 1895PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Proceeding for revocation of probate.

1Opinion of the Court

Arnold^ S.

Tbis. is a proceeding for revocation of probate of tbe will of tlie decedent, under section 2647 of tbe Code. Tbe sole petitioner is Barbara Ellensobn, tbe balfnsister of tbe testator, and a person interested in bis estate. All tbe parties entitled thereto under section 2649 bave been duly cited herein, and all oppose tbe revocation except one Anna Kri’atof, an infant, who> appears by guardian, and files: an answer admitting tbe allegations of tbe petition in respect to tbe invalidity of tbe will. Upon tbe opening of tbe case) tbe respondents, witb tbe *446exception above stated, moved…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In re Peaslee's WillNew York Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Keyes v. EllensohnNew York Supreme Court · 1894
  3. In re Probate of the Alleged Last Will & Testament & Codicil of RuppanerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  4. In re FriedellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  5. Wells v. BettsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Darby v. ArringtonMississippi Supreme Court · 1942
  2. In re RuppanerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API