Legal Opinion

Hair v. Commercial Bank of Live Oak

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 28, 1933PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

The court below held the answer of the appellant, Margaret G. Hair,, to a Rule to show why a writ of assistance should not be issued against her under a foreclosure decree and sale of mortgaged property, to be insufficient and awarded the writ of assistance to issue as' prayed for in the petition to which appellant’s answer was rejected. The appeal is solely from the Court’s order striking parts' of the answer to the rule for writ of assistance and awarding such writ.

The transcript shows that the final decree of foreclosure was entered June 17, 1930, that the mortgaged property was sold by a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Escritt v. MichaelsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Mechling v. McAllisterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  3. Michigan Trust Co. v. City of Red CloudNebraska Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Levi v. LeviSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  2. Dixon v. DixonSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
  3. Sarasota-Fruitville Drainage District v. All Lands Within Said Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Florida · 1946
  4. United States v. Stanley Warford, Robert Ellison, and Ina Ellison, Gerald L. Rainwaters and Cecil R. HowellCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
  5. Brown v. Fritch, Et Vir.Supreme Court of Florida · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API