Legal Opinion

United States v. Stanley Warford, Robert Ellison, and Ina Ellison, Gerald L. Rainwaters and Cecil R. Howell

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided July 9, 1986No. 85-5576PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

KRAVITCH, Circuit Judge:

The United States instituted this action, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2410,1 to redeem property that had been purchased by Rain-waters and Howell. Both sides moved for summary judgment. The district court granted the United States’ motion and Rainwaters and Howell appealed. We must decide whether the United States’ suit is barred by res judicata.

I. BACKGROUND

This dispute involves property in Collier County, Florida. In February 1982, Robert and Ina Ellison filed an action in the Florida courts to foreclose a first mortgage. The Ellisons named the United States, a holder of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  2. Mills v. DuryeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1813
  3. United States v. BrosnanSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. United States v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Ultracashmere House, Ltd., a Corporation v. Ted Meyer, D/B/A Alex Rice CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Stanley Warford, Robert Ellison, and Ina Ellison, Gerald L. Rainwaters and Cecil R. HowellCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API