Rural Water District No. 5 v. City of Coweta
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
JOHN E. DOWDELL, District Judge.
The Court has for its consideration the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by defendants (Doc. 52). Plaintiff filed a response (Doc. 63), and defendants filed a reply brief (Doc. 74). Plaintiff also filed a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 48, 49), to which defendants responded (Doc. 62), and plaintiff filed a reply (Doc. 71). Upon consideration of the parties’ filings and for the reasons set forth herein, the Court finds that the defendants’ motion should be denied, and the plaintiffs motion should be granted in part and denied in part.
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Victor Herbert v. National Academy of SciencesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
- Franks v. NimmoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Garrett Development LLC v. Deer Creek Water CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2021
- Scott v. City of Tulsa, OklahomaDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2025