Legal Opinion

Lintner v. Office Supply Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1928PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoerfler, J.

What was the effect of the instrument of conveyance from Bolton and Jones to Williams? Did it convey a fee in the alley to the grantee, with a reservation of use in the grantors, or did it merely convey a right of way ? A correct solution of this question, in our view, is determinative of the issues in the case. Such was also the view of the lower court, expressed in its opinion.

The instrument of conveyance is clearly in the form of a warranty deed. The clause above quoted, known as the granting clause in a deed, is one in common use in warranty deeds in Wisconsin. Plaintiff’s counsel contend…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Polebitzke v. John Week Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Dyer v. WalkerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Soukup v. TopkaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  4. Towne v. SalentineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Low v. StreeterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1889

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Roundy's Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  2. Hajec v. NovitzkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Loose v. LockeWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Beduhn v. KolarWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Lintner v. Augustine Furniture Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API