Legal Opinion
In re the City of New York
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 21, 1964PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
William C. Hecht, Jr., J.
The city offered in evidence 37 documents bearing Exhibits Nos. 251-A through 251-AK. These documents have been received in evidence over claimants’ objection but subject to their motion to strike after the court had an opportunity to examine them. The documents purport to be 11 field reports” prepared by one Nelson, a sales and service representative of General Motors, and transmitted by him to his superiors at Pontiac, Michigan.
Most of the buses owned by claimants were purchased from General Motors. It was Nelson’s duty to acquaint himself with the maintenance…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Johnson v. LutzNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Weis v. WeisOhio Supreme Court · 1947
- Chesapeake & Delaware Canal Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Williams v. AlexanderNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Yeargans v. YeargansAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
- Harsco Corp. v. Rodolitz Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1969