Legal Opinion
Harsco Corp. v. Rodolitz Realty Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 15, 1969PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Samuel S. Tripp,
Spec. Ref. Reference pursuant to an order dated February 18,1969, made by consent, to hear and determine the issues presented in this action (CPLR 4317, subd. [a]).
Since the complaint herein, verified on August 29, 1966, alleged that Chesebro-Whitman Co., originally named as plaintiff in this action, “is a Division of Patent Scaffolding Co., and in turn, a subsidiary of Harsco Corporation, which is a Delaware corporation duly qualified to do business within the State of New York” and this named plaintiff had no existence as an entity, corporate or otherwise, except as a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Wakeman v. Wheeler & Wilson Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Johnson v. LutzNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Williams v. AlexanderNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
- Brenner v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Carson v. Federal Reserve BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Murray v. DonlanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Wayne County Vinegar & Cider Corp. v. Schorr's Famous Pickled Products, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1983