Legal Opinion

Opinion of the Justices

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 10, 2010No. 384PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*1184Members of the Senate

Alabama State House

Montgomery, Alabama 36130

Dear Senators:

We have received Senate Resolution No. 72, requesting an opinion of the Justices as to whether the “Sanford Amendment,” which the Alabama Senate has adopted and which amends Senate Bill 121 (“S.B. 121”) now pending before the Alabama Legislature, would, if the constitutional amendment proposed by S.B. 121 is ratified, violate certain clauses of the United States Constitution.

The questions posed by Senate Resolution No. 72 are as follows:

“1. Does the Sanford Amendment to S.B. 121, or any part thereof, violate the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. City of Philadelphia v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Maine v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Houston, East & West Texas Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Water Works & Sewer Board of Prichard v. Board of Water & Sewer CommissionersSupreme Court of Alabama · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API