Legal Opinion

Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co. v. Willcuts

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided August 15, 1932No. 2313PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CANT, District Judge.

During a part of the year 1929, and for several years prior thereto, the plaintiff, a Minnesota corporation, and hereinafter so designated, was engaged in business in said state. A time came when it was thought advisable, not to change such business, or the ultimate ownership, or the management thereof, but that the convenient vehicle for carrying on its operations should be a Delaware corporation of the same number of shares of capital stock and authorized to take over the property of the Minnesota corporation and manage the affair’s thereof. A voluntary committee was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Marconi Wireless Telegraph Co. of America v. DuffyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1921

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. American Gas Machine Co. v. WillcutsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
  2. American Mail Line Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1951
  3. Westmoreland Coal Co. v. MacLaughlinDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. George A. Hormel & Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1935
  5. Consolidated Equities, Inc. v. WhiteDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API