Legal Opinion

George A. Hormel & Co. v. United States

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided March 12, 1935No. 2635PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORDBYE, District Judge.

This matter was submitted on a stipulation of facts. There is but one issue to be determined; '.namely, the right of the defendant to tax a' transaction which it contends was a. “transfer of a right to receive shares or certificates of stock as provided for in section 800 of the Revenue Act of 1926, 26 USCA § 901, Schedule A-3.” Briefly, the facts as disclosed by the stipulation may be stated as follows:

George A. Hormel & Co., a Minnesota corporation, on or about September 1, 1928, caused a notice to be sent to its stockholders of a corporate meeting on September 18,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Crooks v. HarrelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Pirie v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
  4. Treat v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  5. Commissioner of Immigration of Port of NY v. GottliebSupreme Court of the United States · 1924

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. First Trust Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1936
  2. Founders General Corp. v. HoeyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API