Legal Opinion
Currier v. Amerigas Propane, L.P.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided August 6, 1999No. 97-908PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
The plaintiffs, James and Rosemary Currier, appeal the decision of the Superior Court {McHugh, J.) granting defendant Amerigas Propane, L.E’s motion for summary judgment. We affirm.
The trial court found the following undisputed facts. The defendant is a Delaware limited partnership, see DEL. CODE ANN. tit. 6, ch. 17 (1993 & Supp. 1998); cf. RSA ch. 304-B (1995 & Supp. 1998), comprised of two partners: the general partner, Amerigas, Inc., see DEL. CODE ANN. tit. 6, §§ 17-401 to -406; cf. RSA 304-B:22 to :26, and the limited partner, Amerigas Partners, L.P., see DEL. CODE ANN. tit. 6, §§ 17-301…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Vogel v. VogelSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- Swiezynski v. CivielloSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
- Leeman v. BoylanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
- Watson v. G.C. Associates Ltd. PartnershipNevada Supreme Court · 1984
- Waite ex rel. Bretton Woods Acquisition Co. v. SylvesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re Paper I Partners, L.P.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Whitfield v. Bonanno Real Estate Group, Tryon Management Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011
- Normand Dumais, Jr., et al. v. United States of America, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2023
- Whitfield v. BONANNO REAL ESTATENew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011
- Dumais v. USADistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2023