Kennelty v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
*13 ORDER
2Per curiam
AND NOW this 14th day of November 2007, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is granted. The order of the Commonwealth Court dated May 31, 2006, is reversed. The WCJ determined that the testimony of the employees of Schwan’s Home Service, Inc., was credible to the extent they testified that the frequency of occurrences of work-related incidents experienced by Petitioner was normal for their specific industry; the Commonwealth Court is not free to disturb this credibility determination based on competent evidence. See Daniels v. WCAB (Tristate Transp.), 574 Pa. 61, 828 A.2d 1043, 1052…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- Daniels v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- RAG (Cyprus) Emerald Resources, L.P. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
4Cited by4 opinions
- Gaughan v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- PA Liquor Control Board v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Kennelty v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- PA Liquor Control Board v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011