Legal Opinion

Yazoo & M. V. R. v. Cockerham

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1924No. 23481PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSykes, P. J.

*894This suit was instituted in the circuit court to recover damages because of fatal injuries sustained by I. Gr. Cockerham, a brakeman in the employ of the appellant railroad company. The suit is brought under the fe4eral Employers’ Liability Act (IT. S. Comp. St., sections 8657-8665). The deceased, Cockerham, sustained fatal injuries while attempting to effect a coupling between the tender of the engine and the first car of the train.

The cause was submitted to the jury and a verdict returned in favor of the appellee, administrator, plaintiff in. the court below, for the sum of thirty thousand…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Delk v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Alabama & V. Ry. Co. v. DennisMississippi Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. GentleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
  2. Yazoo M.V.R. Co. v. DeckerMississippi Supreme Court · 1928
  3. St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. of Texas v. BoundsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  4. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. GentleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API