Legal Opinion · Dissent

St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. of Texas v. Bounds

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 30, 1924No. 2956Published

1Dissent

WII.LSON, O. J.

(dissenting). I do not agree that the testimony Judge HODGES refers to in the opinion disposing of the appeal did not warrant the finding of the jury that the tender of the engine and the B. & O. car were not equipped with the kind of couplers specified in the federal Safety Appliance Statute, and therefore I do not agree that the judgment should be reversed as the other members of the court have determined it should be. (My dissent from the conclusion reached by the majority is partly based on what I understand to be the meaning of the statute as determined in Railway Co. v.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. San Antonio & Aransas Pass Railway Co. v. WagnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. GotschallSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  5. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1913

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API