Legal Opinion
Department of the Navy v. Egan
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided February 23, 1988No. 86-1552PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court 1
484 U.S. 518 (1988)
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
v.
EGAN
No. 86-1552.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued December 2, 1987
Decided February 23, 1988
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
Deputy Solicitor General Cohen argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Solicitor General Fried, Assistant Attorney General Willard, Michael K. Kellogg, Barbara L. Herwig, and Freddi Lipstein.
William J. Nold argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.[*]
2Opinion of the Court · BlackmunJustice Blackmun
Respondent Thomas M. Egan lost his laborer's job at the Trident Naval Refit Facility in Bremerton, Wash.,…
Also in this document: Dissent.
3Cases cited35 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. Hector Manuel Perilla UmbarilaDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2022