Legal Opinion

Finley v. DBM TECHNOLOGIES

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 26, 2007No. 2006-CA-001132-WCPublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TAYLOR, Judge.

Bridget Finley petitions this Court to review an opinion of the Workers’ Com pensation Board (Board) entered April 28, 2006, affirming a decision of the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) to deny Finley’s claim for income and medical benefits related to the arousal of her congenital scoliosis but awarding income and medical benefits related solely to her work-related back injury. For the reasons stated, we vacate and remand.

Finley was hired as a machine operator at DBM Technologies (DBM) in August 2001. On January 30, 2002, Finley lifted a box weighing approximately thirteen…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wolf Creek Collieries v. CrumCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1984
  2. McNutt Construction/First General Services v. ScottKentucky Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Hardy-Burlingham Mining Co. v. HurtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  4. Melcher v. Drummond Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1950
  5. Bright v. American Greetings Corp.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Parker v. Webster County Coal, LLCKentucky Supreme Court · 2017
  2. U.S. Bank Home Mortgage v. SchreckerKentucky Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Plumley v. Kroger, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. Comair, Inc. v. HeltonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2008
  5. Ford Motor Co. (LAP) v. CurtsingerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2017

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API