Legal Opinion

Hardy-Burlingham Mining Co. v. Hurt

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided May 1, 1931PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Dietzman

Reversing.

Section 4933 of the Statutes requires the Workmen’s Compensation Board in hearings of contested applications for compensation to file with the record of the proceedings a statement of its findings of fact, rulings of law, its award, and any other matters pertinent to the question at issue. The requirement that the board shall file its findings of fact is particularly important because, on petitions for a review of its award in the circuit court, the findings of fact, if supported by any relevant and competent evidence, arei conclusive on that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Broughton's Administrator v. Congleton Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  2. South Mountain Coal Co. v. HaddixCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
  3. Octavia J. Coal Mining Company v. CallowayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Finley v. DBM TECHNOLOGIESCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2007
  2. Hayes Freight Lines, Inc. v. BurnsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1956
  3. Hardy-Burlingham Mining Co. v. HurtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  4. January-Wood Company v. BramelCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  5. Stokes v. Black Hawk Coal Company's ReceiverCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API