Legal Opinion

Davis v. Wiley

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 25, 1881PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL FROM JEFFERSON CIRCUIT COURT. [See following case in which rehearing is granted and case reversed. Cited, Ingram v. Cincinnati &c. R. Co., 32 Ky. L. 849, 107 S. W. 239.]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Lewis :

On the 19th day of March, 1870, the firm of Davis, Storts & Co. executed a promissory note for $400 to appellee, and on the 1st of January, 1876, the firm of Davis, Moody & Co., composed of Wm. Davis, Geo. E. Moody, John Mangold and- Camp*581bell, executed to him a note for the same amount. This is an action by appellee against the present firm of Davis, Moody & Co., composed of Geo. E. Moody, John Mangold and John Mitchell, to recover the amounts of the two notes, less credits specified, upon the alleged promise and undertaking of the latter firm to pay, as the successors,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Louisville & Portland Canal Co. v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1872
  2. Judge v. BraswellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1877

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Garth v. Davis & JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1905
  2. United Mining Co. v. MortonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. McCreary Board of Education v. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API