Legal Opinion
State v. Grindling
Hawaii Supreme Court
Decided September 19, 2001No. 23472PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
ACOBA, J.
We hold that the provisions of an unexpired temporary restraining order (TRO) issued pursuant to Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 586-4 (Supp.1999) remain in effect until modified or set aside. Inasmuch as the provisions of the TRO in this case were not modified or set aside, the factual basis for the TRO was not subject to collateral attack at the criminal trial charging Petitioner/Defendant Appellant Christopher Grindling (Petitioner) with violation of the TRO. The second circuit family court (the court), 1 therefore, correctly applied the TRO provision…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- GTE Sylvania, Inc. v. Consumers Union of the United States, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- State v. CullenHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
- First Hawaiian Bank v. WeeksHawaii Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. PattenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
- State v. MottSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Matsuura v. EI Du Pont De Nemours and Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. VeikosoHawaii Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. WrightSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Truesdell v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. PoohinaHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.