Legal Opinion

McDonald v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 6, 2003No. CR 03-957PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Attorney Laura Cunningham represents Randolph McDonald, who was convicted of possession of a controlled substance on a conditional plea under Ark. R. Crim. P. 24.3(b)(2002). Rule 24.3(b) provides that a criminal defendant who makes a conditional plea may appeal from the judgment for review of the adverse determination on the pretrial motion to suppress evidence. As indicated in our September 11, 2003, per curiam, McDonald failed to appeal from the June 4, 2003, judgment. Instead, McDonald attempted to appeal from the November 4,2002, denial of the motion to suppress. Naturally, when the…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  2. Webb v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2006
  3. Downing v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  4. Drake v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2008
  5. Drake v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API