Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re Petition for Readmission of Madden

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 21, 2012No. 12-345Published

1DissentPaul E. Danielson, Justice

I respectfully dissent. As the majority correctly notes, the protection of the public and the honor and integrity of the profession have long been the principal criteria in determining whether a person should be admitted or readmitted to the bar. See Redden v. Arkansas State Bd. of Law Exam’rs, 371 Ark. 584, 269 S.W.3d 359 (2007). But in addition, this court gives due consideration to an applicant’s rehabilitation. See In re Petition of Anderson, 312 Ark. 447, 851 S.W.2d 408 (1993).

While I am cognizant that Madden pled guilty to an offense for which the culpable mental state was not that of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Petition of AndersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  2. In re Petition of ButcherSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  3. Redden v. Arkansas State Board of Law ExaminersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  4. Ligon v. ClouetteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API