Legal Opinion

Whyte v. Lindblom

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 1934PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed June 5, 1934:

Fairchild, J.

The accident happened at the crossing of two roads. The respondent undertook to maintain the lookout for his daughter who was driving the car, thus leaving her free to devote her undivided attention to the operation of the car. The daughter had had some recent experience as a driver and was anxious to demonstrate to her father the success she had attained. It is conceded that the daughter Harriet did not attempt to inform herself as to the presence of any approaching automobiles at the intersection. Respondent was riding in the front…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mertens v. Lake Shore Yellow Cab & Transfer Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Brown v. HaertelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Neuser v. ThelenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Rock v. SarazenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Thieme v. WeykerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Puhl v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Elsie McDonnell Guardian of the Estate of Ronald McDonnell and Elsie McDonnell Individually v. Jeanette TimmermanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1959
  3. Lisowski v. Milwaukee Automobile Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Edson v. Perry-Foley Funeral HomeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  5. Canzoneri v. HeckertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API