Legal Opinion

State v. Marshall

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 4, 1996No. 19373-6-IIPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTurner, J.

Criminal defense attorneys Larry W. Nichols and Dino G. Sepe appeal a Pierce County Superior Court order holding them in contempt for refusing to testify about communications with their former client, convicted murderer Henry L. Marshall. Without determining whether the communications were privileged, we hold that the trial court’s order compelling testimony was premature. We therefore, vacate the contempt order.

Marshall was charged with first degree aggravated murder in Pierce County Superior Court. Nichols and Sepe were appointed as co-counsel to represent him.

In July 1994, the superior…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. PamWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State Ex Rel. Sowers v. OlwellWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Doe v. a CORP.District Court, S.D. New York · 1971
  4. State v. PamCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Russell v. MaasCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  2. State v. WebbeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  3. State v. WebbeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API