Legal Opinion
Arthur H. Smith v. Arnold R. Jago, Supt.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 4, 1990No. 88-3775PublishedCited by 271 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ENGEL, Senior Circuit Judge.
Respondent Arnold Jago, Superintendent of the London Correctional Institution, appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio granting Petitioner Arthur Smith’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 and from the denial of a motion to alter or amend that judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e). The principal issue on appeal is the extent to which the standards of Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), apply where it is alleged that deficient conduct by…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Sumner v. MataSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by271 opinions
- Michael G. Levine v. Patricia Torvik, Stephanie Tubbs Jones, Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Harold McQueen Jr. v. Gene Scroggy, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Ronald Eugene Rickman, Petitioner-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Ricky Bell, Warden, Respondent-Appellant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Charles Howard West v. William Seabold, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Richard Harrison Cremeans v. Walt Chapleau, Warden, and Commonwealth of KentuckyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
266 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.