United States v. Mario Perez-Hernandez
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Per curiam
This appeal challenges the selection of federal grand jury foremen by district judges in the Southern District of Florida between 1974 and 1978. Appellant argues that his indictment should have been dismissed because women and blacks were unconstitutionally excluded from serving as foremen. His claim is based on two separate grounds. First, he contends that the Sixth Amendment and the Jury Selection and Service Act of 1968, 28 U.S.C. § 1861, et seq., require that grand jury foremen represent a fair cross section of the community, just as this representation is required in grand and petit jury…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Taylor v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Duren v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Castaneda v. PartidaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Alexander v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hernandez v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- State v. RamseurSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- United States v. Angelo Pepe and Thomas Miglionico, United States of America v. Albert Joseph Facchiano, Francis Santo, Paul SantoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- Jimmy Lee Horton v. Walter Zant, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification CenterCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Hobby v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.