Legal Opinion

Rhoades v. Barcal

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 28, 1975No. Docket 21977PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtR. B. Burns, J.

Plaintiffs appeal the decision of the trial judge that the relationship between plaintiffs and defendants did not constitute a partnership, and that plaintiffs are not entitled to additional compensation for their labors on behalf of defendants’ Melody Lanes, a bowling and dining facility in South Haven, Michigan.

This is an unfortunate and difficult case, with many disputed questions of fact. Those that are not disputed are as follows.

In early 1967 Deo Rhoades was operating a gas station in South Haven. His business was about to end because the state had condemned the property. Mr. Rhoades…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Christine Building Co. v. City of TroyMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Cascaden v. MagrytaMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Moll v. County of WayneMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  4. In Re Hartman EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. Kurrle v. WalkerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Schneider v. FoxMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Grant v. Van RekenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API