Legal Opinion

Sweet v. Boyd

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 18, 1898PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error from the District Court of Greer County; before-James B. Keaton, District Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Tarsnby, J.:

The defendants m error were, on the 1st day of February, 1896, the owners and in possession of cattle and other personal property, then situated in the county of Greer, which was sought to be subjected to taxation, for territorial and county purposes, by the plaintiffs in error, for the year 1896.

Th \ first question involved for decision upon the record in this case, is, whether the property of defendants in error was subject to taxation by the Territory of Oklahoma and by the county of Greer, as a county of said Territory, for the year 1896. By secs. 1, end…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Warden v. Board of SupervisorsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1861
  3. Borland v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
  4. City of Lawrence v. KillamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
  5. Kline v. VogelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1886

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Crow v. HardridgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. Nelson v. Oklahoma City & W. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. Wright v. SaltmarshSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Wilson v. WigginsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
  5. Protest of Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API