Legal Opinion

Monson v. Drug Enforcement Administration

District Court, D. North Dakota

Decided November 28, 2007No. 3:07-cr-00042PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

DANIEL L. HOVLAND, Chief Judge.

INTRODUCTION

In this case, two North Dakota farmers seeking to cultivate industrial hemp have sought a declaration that they cannot be criminally prosecuted under the federal Controlled Substances Act, 21 U.S.C. § 801 et seq. The issue before the Court is a question of law, namely, whether the Controlled Substances Act applies to the proposed cultivation of industrial hemp pursuant to North Dakota’s new state regulatory regime.

Marijuana and industrial hemp have similar characteristics but far different applications. The…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Babbitt v. United Farm Workers National UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Wickard v. FilburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. United States v. DarbySupreme Court of the United States · 1941

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re Rent-Rite Super Kegs West Ltd.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2012
  2. Olsen v. HolderDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2009
  3. Burchfield v. Alibaba GroupDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2022
  4. Great Lakes Cultivation, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022
  5. Woods v. U.S. Drug Enforcement Admin.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API