Legal Opinion
Kalinoff v. Columbus Township
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided October 13, 1995No. Docket 166845PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.
Defendant Columbus Township appeals as of right an order of the circuit court granting plaintiffs’ motion for summary disposition and denying the township’s motion for summary disposition. We affirm.
Although the dissent addresses an issue that is not raised on appeal, we are restricting our review to the issues that are before us as framed in the township’s brief.1 At issue in this case is the trial court’s construction of Columbus Township Zoning Ordinance No. 17, art IV, § 4.02, regarding nonconforming lots. Plaintiffs alleged in their lawsuit that § 4.02(B) of the ordinance prohibits…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- MacEnas v. Village of MichianaMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
- Albright v. City of PortageMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
- D'AGOSTINI v. City of RosevilleMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
- Settles v. Detroit City ClerkMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
- Oberlin v. Wolverine Gas & Oil Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Norman Corp. v. City of East TawasMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
- Vashi v. Charter Township of West BloomfieldDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001
- City of Rockford v. 63rd District CourtMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
- Norman Corp. v. City of East TawasMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
- City of Grand Rapids v. Brookstone Capital LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.