Legal Opinion

Zeuch v. Durbin

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 29, 1931No. 14,103Published

1Opinion of the CourtNeal, C. J.

Appellant, plaintiff below, instituted this action to recover the balance of principal and interest, in the sum of $6,865.67, as evidenced by a promissory note executed by William N. Durbin and Joseph E. Hennings.

The complaint is in one paragraph. The payors, defendants below, answered in three paragraphs: (1) General denial; (2) no consideration; (3) fraud in the procurement of the note by false and fraudulent representations. The defendants filed a cross-complaint in which they alleged that the note sued on was procured by fraud and by false and fraudulent statements, representations, and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Shields v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Union Trust Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  3. Inland Steel Co. v. IlkoIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad v. RushtonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1925
  5. Grand Rapids & Indiana Railway Co. v. KingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1908

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API