St. Clair v. Commonwealth
Kentucky Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partCooper, Justice
I concur in the majority opinion’s affir-mance of the jury’s verdict of guilt in this case (though not with its analysis of the evidence relating to the Van Zandt deposition) and in its reversal for a new penalty phase trial. However, I dissent from the majority’s conclusion that Appellant is eligible for the death penalty in this case.
I. VAN ZANDT DEPOSITION.
At the time of trial, Bylynn Van Zandt, Appellant’s former wife, lived in Durant, Oklahoma. Less than two weeks before trial, the Commonwealth petitioned the trial court for a certificate to obtain her attendance as a witness at trial.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Barber v. PageSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
- Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Rogers v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.