Legal Opinion

Smith v. Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & France, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 24, 2020No. Civil Action No. 2018-2532Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NATHAN SMITH, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 18-2532 (TJK) ULTA SALON, COSMETICS & FRAGRANCE, INC., d/b/a/ ULTA BEAUTY, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Nathan Smith alleges that his former employer Ulta Beauty discriminated against him because of his gender and retaliated against him in violation of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000(e) et seq., and the D.C. Human Rights Act,

D.C. Code § 2-1401.01

et seq. Ulta Beauty has moved to dismiss the complaint as untimely and for sanctions under 28 U.S.C. § 1927. Unfortunately for…

2Cases cited18 opinions

Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
Baldwin County Welcome Center v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
Jones v. BernankeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
Smith-Haynie, J. C. v. Davis, AddisonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.