Legal Opinion
Fishman Transducers, Inc. v. Paul
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided July 3, 2012No. 11-1663PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOUDIN, Circuit Judge.
This appeal concerns claims by Fishman Transducers, Inc. (“Fishman”), primarily for trademark infringement and false advertising under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1051 et seq. (2006), against HSN Interactive LLC (“HSN”), musician Stephen Paul and his company Daystar Productions. Fishman failed to get the relief it sought in the district court and now appeals. We refer to the Lanham Act throughout by its Title 15 section numbers rather than the sections in the original statute.
Fishman is a developer and manufacturer of electronic equipment, specifically a highly-regarded…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Sturgis Motorcycle Rally, Inc. v. Rushmore Photo & Gifts, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
- Bellwether Cmty. Credit Union v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2018
- Jason Scott Collection, Inc. v. Trendily Furniture, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Yah Kai World Wide Enters., Inc. v. NapperCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Paleteria La Michoacana, Inc. v. Productos Lacteos Tocumbo S.A. De C.V.District Court, District of Columbia · 2015
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.