Legal Opinion
Margaret SPAULDING, Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON, Defendant-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 13, 1982No. 80-3528PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SNEED, Circuit Judge:
Appellants appeal the district court’s order requiring them to pay for preparation of a transcript of proceedings before a magistrate in a suit alleging, inter alia, violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Appellants contend that the transcript was necessary to enable them to obtain the review by the district court to which they are entitled.1 We hold that under the facts present in this case the district court should have had a transcript prepared without cost to the parties. Having failed to receive a stay of the review proceedings before the district…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Bradley v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Donald Milton Orand v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- McDonnell Douglas Corporation v. Commodore Business MacHines Inc. And Commodore Business MacHines (Canada) LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Bruce A. Campbell v. United States District Court for the Northern District of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. Errol F. Remsing and Jerry H. DefoorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Gee v. EstesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Margaret Spaulding, and James Bush, Intervenors-Appellants v. University of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Gee v. EstesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Edward COCKRHAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTH CENTRAL BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.