Legal Opinion
Gee v. Estes
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided September 28, 1987No. Nos. 86-1176, 86-1397PublishedCited by 179 opinions
1Per curiam
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a); Tenth Cir.R. 34.1.8(c) and 27.-1.2. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Plaintiff, Donald Gee, is a federal prisoner, acting pro se and proceeding in forma pauperis, who commenced an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against a county sheriff and several other police officers working at the Natrona County, Wyoming jail during his incarceration there.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Martinez v. AaronCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
- Norman R. Spears v. O.L. McCotter Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Donald and Ronald HILL, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. the DURIRON COMPANY, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Wimmer v. CookCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by179 opinions
- Hall v. BellmonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Hall v. BellmonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Steven v. Summers v. State of Utah Salt Lake Commissioners "John Does 1-5", and Salt Lake City Corporation Officer James E. FaraoneCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Northington v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Anderson v. County of KernCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
174 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.