Legal Opinion

Kennedy v. Kennedy

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1922No. 23,892PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEwbank, J.

Appellees filed a complaint to contest the will of Sarah A. Kennedy, on the alleged grounds that the testatrix was of unsound mind, that the pretended will was unduly executed, and that its execution was procured by undue influence and by fraud. Each of the appellants answered by a denial. The jury returned a verdict which recited that they found for the plaintiffs and that the execution of said instrument probated as the will of Sarah A. Kennedy was procured by the undue influence of Frieda Kennedy and Nellie Kennedy *354Chizum, two of the defendants (appellants), and was not her will. A motion…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Snowball v. SnowballCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. McDonald v. McDonaldIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Lavinburg v. SchwalbeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Wiley v. GordonIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Roller v. KlingIndiana Supreme Court · 1898

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lee v. SchroederIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Bechert v. LeheIndiana Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Jarrett v. EllisIndiana Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Loeser v. SimpsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Lee v. SchroederIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API